Bharat ka Naya Kisan, Nayee Umeed-The Farm Bill 2020 - The Fearless Indian
Home / India / Bharat ka Naya Kisan, Nayee Umeed-The Farm Bill 2020

Bharat ka Naya Kisan, Nayee Umeed-The Farm Bill 2020

  • Sukanya Iyer
  • September 18, 2020
Follow us on

As I Start to Pen down my Thoughts for our Kisan, & lot of Thoughts for & against the New Farm Bill which Strengthens & empowers the Farmers more than ever, before I go into the details, I would like to Start with a Quote on Farmers–
“Farmers are the backbone of our Country, & you cant Stand Straight if your backbone is broken. The life of a Farmer works on a Tough condition, & works very hard day & night in all Seasons for all of us”
With the Above Quote, would give my Perspective on –The Farm Bill 2020

Friends, The  Farm bill 2020 is the most important Agri reform ever taken, which allows farmers to sell their produce directly at their doorsteps, it basically removes middlemen from the system. Opposition politicians are organizing this protest to save middlemen, how shameless they can become, can’t they at least once raise their morale and support what is good for the country. The actual protesters are not the majority of small and medium-sized farmers, this is the protest instigated by cartels of middlemen commission agents and mandi owners with the help of, The existing systems favor large and medium farmers and commission Agents, besides corrupt state government officials. 


The new bill will help a very large number of small and medium farmers and will also, How selfish are these people who are protesting? , firstly we should think about how we had kept such an insane law for so many years.  And when one is seriously trying to reform this then they are showing crocodile tears for poor farmers. Farmers are poor because the system wants them to stay poor. They are nothing but treated as vote banks by a politician. We speak a lot about farmers’ suicide, if we have a working model like this then farmers are bound to be looted. this is their land and their crop they should have freedom of selling and earn money. This bill is very much Pro Farmer, rather It creates hope of rooting out middlemen who gulp up major profits while a farmer gets peanuts. If implemented, it would help farmers to get a fair share of its prices, so I wonder why are they protesting? 


Friends this time be aware and please don’t allow this politician who has Vested interest Vested Spread Misinformation & we have to ignore & look for such people with Ulterior People are given A Factual rebuttal, there is a need to stay firmly and solidly behind the Resolve of our Government whose Intent is very clear of Saving the Farmers from the “CLUTCHES OF MIDDLEMEN” & bring in uniformity in their growth levels throughout India.

Why Farmers in Punjab and Haryana have been  protesting against three ordinances promulgated by the Centre on June 5, let us have a brief look at–

Farmers in Punjab and Haryana have been protesting against three ordinances promulgated by the Centre on June 5. After the Monsoon Session of Parliament began this week, the government has introduced three Bills to replace these ordinances. Lok Sabha passed these bills this week. On Thursday, SAD leader Sukhbir Badal announced in Lok Sabha that Harsimrat Badal, the Union Minister for Food Processing Industries from his party, will resign in protest over these bills.


What are these ordinances, and why are farmers protesting?
They are called The Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Ordinance, 2020; The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Ordinance, 2020; and The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020. While farmers are protesting against all three ordinances, their objections are mostly against the provisions of the first. And while there is no uniform demand among the protesters or a unified leadership, it emerges that their concerns are mainly about sections relating to “trade area”, “trader”, “dispute resolution” and “market fee” in the first ordinance. A look at these sections, one by one:
What is the Trade area?


Section 2(m) of The Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Ordinance, 2020 defines “trade area” as any area or location, place of production, collection, and aggregation including (a) farm gates; (b) factory premises; (c) warehouses; (d) silos; (e) cold storages; or (f) any other structures or places, from where the trade of farmers’ produce may be undertaken in the territory of India.

The definition does not, however, include “the premises, enclosures, and structures constituting (i) physical boundaries of principal market yards, sub-market yards, and market sub-yards managed and run by the market committees formed under each state APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee) Act”. It also excludes “private market yards, private market sub-yards, direct marketing collection centers, and private farmer-consumer market yards managed by persons holding licenses or any warehouses, silos, cold storages or other structures notified as markets or deemed markets under each State APMC Act in force in India”.


In effect, existing mandis established under APMC Acts have been excluded from the definition of trade area under the new legislation. The government says the creation of an additional trade area outside of mandis will provide farmers the freedom of choice to conduct trade in their produce. The protesters say this provision will confine APMC mandis to their physical boundaries and give a free hand to big corporate buyers. “The APMC mandi system has developed very well as every mandi caters to 200-300 villages. But the new ordinance has confined the mandis to their physical boundaries,” said Balbir Singh Rajewal, president of Bhartiya Kisan Union (Rajewal), who tried to protest against the ordinances at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi but was not allowed by police.


Haryana farmers refuse to pause dharnas, talks with Centre today farmers are protesting in Punjab and Haryana. (Express Photo)What is ‘trader’ and how is it linked to the protests Section 2(n) of the first ordinance defines a “trader” as “a person who buys farmers’ produce by way of inter-State trade or intra-State trade or a combination thereof, either for self or on behalf of one or more persons for the purpose of wholesale trade, retail, end-use, value addition, processing, manufacturing, export, consumption or for such other purpose”. Thus, it includes processor, exporter, wholesaler, miller, and retailer.


According to the Ministry of the Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, “Any trader with a PAN card can buy the farmers’ produce in the trade area.”A trader can operate in both an APMC mandi and a trade area. However, for trading in the mandi, the trader would require a license/registration as provided for in the State APMC Act. In the present mandi system, arhatiyas (commission agents) have to get a license to trade in a mandi.

The protesters say Arhatiyas have credibility as their financial status is verified during the licence approval process. “But how can a farmer trust a trader under the new law?” Rajewal said.This also explains why the protests have mostly been concentrated in Punjab and Haryana. The arhatiya system is more influential in these two states than in other states, agriculture experts said.

Why does the provision on ‘market fee’ worry protesters?
Section 6 states that “no market fee or cess or levy, by whatever name called, under any State APMC Act or any other State law, shall be levied on any farmer or trader or electronic trading and transaction platform for trade and commerce in scheduled farmers’ produces in a trade area”. Government officials say this provision will reduce the cost of transaction and will benefit both the farmers and the traders.


Under the existing system, such charges in states like Punjab come to around 8.5% — a market fee of 3%, a rural development charge of 3%, and the arhatiya’s commission of about 2.5%. Rajewal said that by removing the fee on trade, the government is indirectly incentivizing big corporates. They said this provision does not provide a level playing field to APMC mandis. “If you calculate the mandi transaction cost on 1 quintal wheat, at 8.5% all-inclusive, it comes about Rs 164. So, on the sale of every quintal of wheat outside of the mandi, you are incentivizing big corporates, who will use this difference to offer better prices to farmers in the initial days. And when the APMC mandi system collapses in due course, they will monopolize the trade,” Rajewal said.

A government official, on the other hand, questioned why the states do not make transactions in mandis cost-efficient. “When they are giving free electricity and other subsidies, why can’t they provide a free facility to farmers for selling their produce?” the official said.


Haryana protests, Haryana farmers protest, Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce Ordinance, Haryana news, Indian express protest in Sirsa last Friday. (Express Photo)What is the object as far as dispute resolution is concerned The protesters say that the provision on dispute resolution under Section 8 does not sufficiently safeguard farmers’ interests? It provides that in case of a dispute arising out of a transaction between the farmer and a trader, the parties may seek a mutually acceptable solution through conciliation by filing an application to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, who shall refer such dispute to a Conciliation Board to be appointed by him for facilitating the binding settlement of the dispute.


Farmers fear the proposed system of conciliation can be misused against them. They say the ordinance does not allow farmers to approach a civil court. The Government of India opines a complete resolve to Strengthen the Farmers Community & to save from Monopolies, but this Farm bill is going to Empower Kisan & also save them from the oppression of Farmers, As our PM Modi says this Bill is “MEANT TO SHIELD OUR FARMERS”, Farmers will be able to buy & Sell outside the MANDIS. While the Opposition has echoed farmers in alleging that the new legislation will benefit only big farmers and hoarders, the government said the provisions will be beneficial to all: farmers, consumers, and traders.


“Almost all agriculture experts and economists were batting for these reforms in the agriculture sector. The Centre was also persuading states to implement the Model APMC Act, 2002-03. But the states did not fully adopt it. Therefore, the Centre had to adopt the ordinance route… It will lead to helping farmers realize a better price. This is very forward-looking legislation and it is a win-win situation for all farmers, consumers, and entrepreneurs,” said Ramesh Chand, member of NITI Aayog.


This Farm Bill is very Historic & Modi Sarkar is committed towards Farmers & this Bill comes as a Defence shield for them. System of MSP, Government Procurement retained. And as usual, Opposition who failed in their Past to regulate all these changes as many people have a Stake in APMC, and the reason for them to get Agitated. Agricultural Ordinances will Empower Farmers by giving the original Price for their Produce. Farm Bill will increase Profit for them, Farmers can sell their Produce anywhere & Everywhere directly, Arent these Advantageous. Those who ruled our Nation for decades are Indulging into Fearmongering, as they Promised big but in reality didn’t do much…Indian Farmers are no more Bonded Labourers by making more Independent & giving more Powers to our ANNADATA

ANNADATA SUKHI BHAV…
Thank you PM Modi for this Historic Farm Bill for Providing Fair Pricing through MSP, saving them from Middlemen & giving them More opportunities for them to carry out their Activities Freely & without any Bondage
Naya Bharat, Naya Kisan, Nayee Umeed 
Jai Hind 
Dr. Sukanya Subbanna Iyer 

Facebook Comments

You may also like

Check Also

Historical Mistake Corrected on Thorium Reactors – Nitis of UPA Regime to Modi Sarkar

...

Loading...